Key messages from scientific research that's ready to be acted on
Got It, Hide thisNam JL, Ramiro S, Gaujoux-Viala C, et al. Efficacy of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a systematic literature review informing the 2013 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:516-28.
In people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), do biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (biologics) improve symptoms and slow disease progression?
RA is a chronic (long-term) condition that results in inflammation, usually of the small joints in your hands and feet. It affects the lining of the joints, causing painful swelling that can eventually wear down bone. Unlike the more common osteoarthritis, which is due to wear and tear damage, RA is an autoimmune disease in which the body’s immune system attacks the joints.
Treatment of RA focuses on controlling symptoms (pain and swelling) and preventing joint damage. Doctors will usually start by prescribing drugs that have the fewest side-effects; if they don’t work well, they move onto different types of drugs or combinations of drugs. Biologics are a fairly new type of medication that is prescribed for people who do not respond to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or who have had side-effects.
The researchers did a systematic review, including studies available up to February 2013.
They found 108 reports. Only the results of randomized controlled trials are reported here because they make up the strongest evidence available. The safety of biologics was not addressed in this report.
All studies included at least 50 people and lasted 6 months or more.
People had RA or were at risk of developing RA. Some people had previously been treated with DMARDs, such as methotrexate, but they did not work or did not work well enough. Others had not previously used DMARDs.
A variety of biologics were studied, including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, anakinra, rituximab, and tocilizumab.
People with early RA who had not previously used methotrexate
Biologics plus methotrexate improved symptoms more than methotrexate alone.
People who had not previously used methotrexate
Biologics plus methotrexate improved symptoms more than methotrexate alone.
People who previously used methotrexate, but their symptoms did not improve as much as expected
Biologics plus methotrexate improved symptoms more than methotrexate alone.
Biologics plus methotrexate did not improve symptoms more than biologics alone.
People who did not respond to previous DMARDs
Biologics plus DMARDs improved symptoms more than DMARDs alone.
People who did not respond to previous methotrexate
Biologics plus methotrexate improved symptoms more than biologics alone.
In people with RA, biologics plus methotrexate or another DMARD improve symptoms more than biologics alone or methotrexate or other DMARDs alone.
Group | Treatment and comparison | Number of trials (people) | Rate of events with treatment | Rate of events with control | Absolute effect of treatment* |
People with early RA who had not previously used methotrexate | Biologics + methotrexate vs methotrexate alone | 9 trials (5,253 people) | 38% | 23% | About 15 more people out of 100 improved |
People who had not previously used methotrexate | Biologics + methotrexate vs biologics alone | 3 trials (1,601 people) | 34% | 25% | About 9 more people out of 100 improved |
People who did not respond well to previous methotrexate | Biologics + methotrexate vs methotrexate alone | 24 trials (8,783 people) | 17% | 4% | About 13 more people out of 100 improved |
| Biologics + methotrexate vs biologics alone | 5 trials (1,653 people) | 14% | 13% | No effect†|
People who did not respond to any previous conventional DMARD | Biologics + DMARDs vs DMARDs alone | 7 trials (3,130 people) | 22% | 6% | About 16 more people out of 100 improved |
People who did not respond to previous methotrexate | Biologics + methotrexate vs biologics alone | 4 trials (1,504 people) | 43% | 31% | About 12 more people out of 100 improved |
*Outcome is improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and pain, disability, or signs measured by doctors.
†Although the rates for the 2 groups look a little different, the differences were not statistically significant—this means that the differences could simply be due to chance rather than due to the different treatments.